Translate

Saturday, May 31, 2014

Make your car healthier and safer


NOTICE HOW WADS of crisp, newly printed P1,000 bills or the interior of a brand new car emit certain odors that make you giddy with delight?

The scent of clean, new money is a wonderful “pick-me-up” caused by chemicals in the special inks used in printing these bills. You could literally call the effect produced by these inks “a million peso high.”

The odor emitted by the interior of a brand new car, on the other hand, comes from the many chemical compounds used to make practically everything inside the passenger compartment.

Those chemicals, baked by the heat inside the closed compartment, produce that distinctive “new car smell” that assaults your senses once you open the car door. You could also describe the effect as a “million peso high” since many new cars in this country cost over a million pesos.

Unlike the harmless giddiness produced by money, however, that “new car smell” comes from toxic gases—and could be dangerous to your health.



PBDEs and phthalates
In 2006, a groundbreaking study released by The Ecology Center showed that interiors of cars and other motor vehicles contain dangerous levels of toxic chemicals. The Ecology Center is a membership-based, nonprofit environmental organization based in Ann Arbor, Michigan that keeps tabs on toxic car chemicals.

Its 2006 report entitled, "Toxic At Any Speed: Chemicals in Cars and the Need for Safe Alternatives," reveals that many materials producing that “new car smell” are made from toxic chemicals known to pose major public health risks.

Car interiors are made from different kinds of plastics or “plasticized” leather. According to health experts, these plastics constantly emit toxins vaporized from the different plastic components in the car’s interior.

New cars carry 250 pounds of plastic on average. Most of these plastics are used in arm rests, door panels, steering wheels, dashboards, interior seat cushions and switches.

This toxic chemical climate in automobile interiors is normally caused by “PBDEs,” (chemicals used as fire retardants) and “phthalates,” (or phthalic acid esters, which are chemicals used to soften PVC plastics). The study found PBDEs and phthalates in dangerous amounts in dust and windshield film samples.

PBDEs or Polybrominated diphenyl ethers are organobromine compounds used as flame retardants. The European Union has banned the use of PBDEs and polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) in electric and electronic devices out of health concerns.

PBDEs and phthalates are considered volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These are carbon-based chemicals that can evaporate into the air under the right conditions such as high temperatures caused by sunlight.

The most prevalent VOCs found in new cars are benzene (a human carcinogen); ethylbenzene (a systemic toxic agent) and acetone (a mucosal irritant).

“Off-gassing”
The Ecology Center described cars as “chemical reactors” that release toxins in a process called “off-gassing.” It said PBDE, phthalates and other chemicals are inhaled or ingested by drivers and passengers through dust and air, potentially causing allergic or other acute reactions, and long-term health problems such as birth defects, impaired learning, liver toxicity and cancer.

Off-gassing is triggered by high interior temperatures caused by sunlight, a process that accelerates in cars parked under the sun. The combination of higher temperatures caused by windshields and windows, and UV exposure from sunlight can cause PBDEs in cars to become up to five times more dangerous than in homes and offices.

The study also showed significantly higher levels of PBDEs in vehicles studied compared to levels in homes and offices measured in previous studies, making “in-car pollution” a major source of indoor air pollution.

The study said toxic chemical exposure inside vehicles is a major source of potential indoor air pollution since the average American spends about 1.5 hours in a car everyday. Children are the most vulnerable to off-gassing.

U.S. automakers, however, believe that chemicals such as the PBDE flame retardants are needed to protect people in crashes. They claim these chemicals have been shown not to pose a risk to occupants.

“Safe” plastics
The Ecology Center’s website at www.healthycar.org provides a wealth of information about the dangers of off-gassing. HealthyCar.org tested some 450 of the most popular vehicle models in the U.S. from 2006-2009.

It noted that two car makers had made significant improvements since the original findings and had joined another company as the three leaders in using “safe” plastics for indoor auto parts. The trio also widely uses bio-based materials; is improving interior air quality and reducing PVC use.

One maker developed an eco-plastic made from sugar cane or corn and is building a pilot plant to produce it. Another is developing a soy-based foam and a bio-fabric for its car seats.

Japanese car makers, however, became the first to set an industry-wide goal of reducing VOCs in passenger compartments. They agreed to cut levels of 13 VOCs (including styrene and formaldehyde) to match Japanese requirements for homes.

A separate study on VOCs, PBDEs and phthalates conducted by Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) discovered extremely high levels of these substances in new cars.

It found that total VOC levels were very high in two locally made cars that reached the market one to two months after manufacture. These levels decreased some seven-fold in the first month, but still exceeded Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council indoor air standard.

While there is no comparable study in the Philippines, it is probably safe to assume that Filipino drivers and passengers face the same dangers from off-gassing as do their American and Australian counterparts.

One must remember, however, that exposure to VOCs, PBDEs and phthalates does not automatically mean one will get sick.

Among the many factors that determine if new car owners and their passengers may become ill from off-gassing include exposure to one or more individual VOCs or VOC combinations that create another compound; length of time of exposure and personal characteristics such as age and general health status.

Tips for a healthier car
Filipino car owners will also benefit from these tips on how to minimize the dangers from off-gassing and make their cars healthier:

  • Vacuum often;
  • Use solar reflectors often;
  • Ventilate the car interior often;
  • Park in the shade or away from sunlight as much as possible

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

The sculptor of God


“YOU ARE A GREAT artist, Theos. The gods use you to shower beauty upon mankind."

Theos bowed in acknowledgment of the compliment and flexed his scarred and bandaged fingers.

“Magnificent!” exclaimed his patron as he gazed in awe at the many glorious sculptures in Theos' studio never before seen by other men.

“All of this is truly divine. And to think you created these works of genius here in drab, uninspiring Jerusalem. Jerusalem of all places! The gods love you, Theos. Athena is surely pleased.”

“They bless me with my gift,” replied the Greek sculptor modestly. “I am honored by their divine favors.”

“And when do you take all these to Rome?” asked the aristocrat.

“A month from today.”

“Let those copycat Romans envy magnificent Greek art! The barbarians!” exclaimed the Greek aristocrat with pride.

“I thank you for your generous patronage. None of this would have been possible without your munificence,” said Theos.

“Think nothing of it,” said the portly aristocrat with a broad smile. “This will be a very profitable investment for my business partners and I.

“The Romans will pay extravagantly for your exquisite creations. Very extravagantly! How many sculptures in all?”

“There are 10 and they are all life-size depictions of beautiful goddesses and beautiful women,” replied Theos.

“They look so lifelike! Your hands are truly blessed by the gods, Theos. I think I desire them all,” said the aristocrat, who then broke into hearty laughter.

“I, too, love them all,” Theos stated.

“But Aphrodite is the loveliest by far among these blessed women and it is fitting the goddess of love should have a statue that makes men insane with ecstasy.”

Theos led the aristocrat to Aphrodite’s gleaming statue and the incredible realism of its beauty left the guest awestruck.

“This is miraculous! She has to be alive!” the wide-eyed aristocrat shouted.

He reached out with trembling arm to touch the statue, and exhaled in relief when he felt cold marble and not warm flesh.

“How did you do this?”

“I am possessed by the gods,” the sculptor calmly replied.

“Intense beauty is a blinding light that confounds the senses so that one is unable to discern living flesh from inanimate stone,” Theos explained.

“The gods have infused my hands with magic. They control me when I work so I feel neither exhaustion nor pain. The goad is an unrelenting quest for the beautiful. All are enslaved by the beautiful.”

The aristocrat stared at Theos and thought him half-mad after this discourse he barely understood.

Great artists were said to be like that, he had heard. Or were they half-godlike? No matter. The aristocrat shook off this unaccustomed musing and bade Theos farewell.

“Protect your creations with your life,” he said on departing.

“I shall.”

Alone with his women, Theos dropped wearily onto a cot, raising a plume of dust. He coughed heavily and massaged the fingers of his trembling hands.

A mind tormented by a manic zeal and a hairsbreadth away from insanity was not the only price paid by a great artist, he mused. His body also suffered greatly.

He failed to tell the aristocrat of the exhaustion and pain that tore through his body after the exhilaration of creation faded. But he lied when he declared Olympian gods were the wellspring of his wondrous skill.

He should have said his Lord, Jesus Christ, had blessed him with this marvelous gift through a miracle of Mary, His Mother.

But to have done so would have infuriated the aristocrat and he would have hurled Theos back into the dire poverty from whence he escaped. Theos had no more stomach for poverty.

He was now almost rich and famous and would become undeniably so when his women were presented in magnificent Rome, the capital of the universe, where art flourished amidst inexhaustible wealth.

He wept because of his lies and asked Jesus’ forgiveness. He arose from the cot and opened a locked cabinet. Inside was an ornately designed box etched with symbols from Christ’s Passion Theos himself had carved with the greatest care.

The minute, carved figures seemed to spring to life. Such was Theos’ incredible skill that he could infuse the illusion of life into objects he created, whether large or intricately small.

Inside the box were two objects wrapped in cloth dyed Tyrian purple, the color only Roman Emperors could wear. It meant certain death if he were to be caught with these purple garments, but Jesus was worthy of the highest praise.

The artist unwrapped the first object and with great reverence set upon the alcove a sculpture depicting the face of His Lord, Jesus Christ. The second was that of the woman whose intercession had changed Theos’ life forever: Mary, the Mother of Jesus.

As with his other sculptures, these two were magnificent works of genius. More than all the rest, however, they were the finest Theos had ever created or would ever create.

The detail was startling: one could discern the folds in the face of the Savior; detect a gleam that gave life to His eyes and if one stared closely, one would swear the nostrils of the Savior flared as if He were breathing.

And Theos knew that when he looked at these images through his tears, they did come to life!

The eyes of Our Savior would glow with great kindness and you could see, really see, Mary’s lips form that gentle smile Theos first saw all those long years past. And They would speak to him.

He knelt before them, whom he considered his Parents, and begged forgiveness for his cowardice. He asked for the strength to proclaim himself a follower of Christ and to use his gift to proclaim to the world the greater glory of God.

Theos would later be crucified for his faith, and his shattered body buried unmourned in a shallow grave on a barren hilltop outside Rome. He was a coward no more.

And in the darkest days of Rome’s murderous persecution of Christ’s followers, those Christians that survived drew great strength from two statues that came to life amid tears of love and terror.

And the courageous band of Christians would rejoice, knowing their Savior and His Mother were alive and spoke to them through statues made by an unknown Greek sculptor who had been crucified a Christian.

The blessed hands of the sculptor of God had worked their greatest miracle.





Friday, March 14, 2014

Sugar: the sweet enemy



ONE IN FIVE FILIPINOS is overweight and one in five overweight Filipinos is obese.

This statistic from the Philippine National Nutrition Health Evaluation and Survey of 2003 seems as fantastic at first sight as it was when it was first released years ago. Obesity in the Philippines?

It becomes all the more eye-popping when one remembers that 26% of Filipinos—one in four— live below the national poverty line.

That line was P7,017 monthly for a family of five in 2009, the year of the government’s latest poverty data. It’s tougher in Metro Manila: a family of five needed to earn P8,300 a month to escape being labeled poor.

One could surmise the overweight belong to the three in four Filipinos who aren’t poor. That would seem logical.

But there are children who belong to families officially classified as poor who are overweight and obese. How does one explain that?

Fast food and junk food
The 2005 Nutritional Status for Filipino Children conducted by the Department of Science and Technology’s Food and Nutrition Research Institute said a major reason for obesity among youngsters is their unparalleled access to cheap,widely available, high-calorie and appetizing food, otherwise known as fast food and junk food.

This is a valid reason but it still doesn’t completely answer the question: If one in four Filipinos is poor, why is one in five Filipinos overweight?

A recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine may shed light on a probable reason why. This study showed that poor families in Ohio that moved to lower poverty areas were less likely to become obese and less likely to have glucose levels typical of diabetes compared to families that stayed in poor neighborhoods.

Previous U.S. studies have shown that poor neighborhoods tend to lack good sources of nutritious food and this contributes to obesity and ill health in residents. That means the poor are becoming obese also by eating junk food and fast food.

Whether or not we can draw the same conclusion about poor Filipino families is debatable. But this U.S. finding is food for thought.

The sweet common link
Is there a single reason why a growing number of persons worldwide, including Filipinos, across all economic classes are becoming too fat for their own health?

Yes, there is a common link, according to Dr. Robert Lustig, Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

It’s sugar. Or, more precisely, two kinds of sugar: sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS).

Dr. Lustig and two fellow doctors ignited a maelstrom of controversy this February by declaring that sugar and other sweeteners are poisons that should be regulated.

It’s not the first time a medical doctor has called sugar a poison but the research by Dr. Lustig and his team was so widely covered by traditional print media and on the Internet as to spark emotional debates in the medical and non-medical communities worldwide. One of the first works by a doctor calling sugar a poison dates back to 1972.

In a research paper published in the scientific journal, Nature, Dr. Lustig and his team proposed that governments levy a tax on all foods and drinks that include added sugar to discourage consumption. He called on governments worldwide to regulate soft drinks and other products with sugar as strictly as beer and alcoholic beverages.

The alcohol in beer, by the way, is made by fermenting sugar.

More controversially, Dr. Lustig asked that sales of sugar-enhanced food and drinks be banned in or near schools. He would also restrict the purchase of sugared products to a certain age limit similar to the 18-year old age limit on alcohol purchases in the USA.

Dr. Lustig loudly advocates this severe regulation of sugar because sugar is a poison in the medical sense of that term.

More specifically, Dr. Lustig and his team zeroed in on two specific types of sugars as poisons: sucrose (or table sugar) and HFCS (the most popular sweetener used in soft drinks worldwide).

He cited a widely used medical definition of a poison as any substance applied to the body, ingested or developed within the body, which causes or may cause disease.

The physical definition of a poison is any substance that inhibits the activity of a catalyst, which is a minor substance, chemical or enzyme that activates a reaction.

Based on these definitions, Dr. William Coda Martin classified refined sugar as poison in 1957 because all the vitamins, minerals, salts, fibers and proteins that make sugar useful to the body are removed during the process of sugar refining.What is left after processing is a substance full of empty calories that becomes toxic when consumed in excess.

Dr. Lustig agrees with this definition of sugar as a poison.

He does not, however, include naturally occurring sugars such as glucose in his crusade against sugar. Glucose is a sugar naturally found in all foods that have carbohydrates.

Dr. Lustig’s findings in his research paper echo his views at a symposium in 2009 entitled, Sugar: the Bitter Truth. The video of this symposium remains on YouTube and has had over two million hits.

In this video, he described glucose, which is the primary energy source for human cells, as the “energy of life.” Glucose is also known by much of the general public, especially by diabetics, as “blood sugar.”


HFCS: most dangerous of all
Soft drinks or carbonated beverages are the main sources of HFCS, the most dangerous sugar, in the diet of Filipinos or anyone else in any country where soft drinks are sold. And that’s practically all the 196 countries on Earth.

HFCS is a sweetener added to soft drinks and processed foods such as cereals, some meats, yoghurt and sauces. It’s much cheaper than sucrose and this accounts for the widespread popularity of HFCS among beverage and processed food makers.

In the USA, more than 450 calories of an American’s daily calories come from beverages and 40% from soft drinks or fruit juices.

HFCS is dangerous because it attacks the liver, said Dr. Lustig, since only the liver can metabolize fructose. He described fructose as a chronic hepatotoxin or a toxic substance that damages the liver.

“Fructose is a poison by itself,” he declared.

Among the liver's many vital functions is detoxification or the removal of toxins from the body. Fructose is metabolized by the liver unlike glucose, which is safely metabolized by cells throughout the body from complex carbohydrates.

The strain HFCS places on the liver starts a process that can lead to fatty liver disease and liver failure. The liver metabolizes fructose as a fat, hence the key role of fructose in encouraging obesity.

Dr. Lustig said 30% of fructose ends up as fat. Therefore, a high sugar diet equals a high fat diet.

“A low fat diet isn’t really low fat because the fructose/sucrose doubles as fat. That’s why diets don’t work.”

Fructose can also trigger the development of Type 2 diabetes since the high levels of sugar in the blood from un-metabolized fructose mean the pancreas has to produce more insulin, the hormone that helps control and keep stable blood sugar levels.

The increased demands on the liver caused by HFCS may ultimately lead to insulin resistance, which is the underlying cause of obesity and diabetes.

Dr. Lustig pointed out that acute fructose ingestion does not stimulate insulin to combat rising sugar levels, neither does fructose suppress the hunger hormone, ghrelin. The result is that the brain does not signal the body to stop ingesting fructose.

“Chronic fructose exposure alone causes metabolic syndrome,” said Dr. Lustig.

He described metabolic syndrome as a conglomerate of phenomena that includes obesity, Type 2 diabetes, lipid problems, hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

“Fructose triggers all of these,” he said. In this sense, fructose can be considered a poison.

He also said the high level of HFCS in some infant formulas was contributing to the epidemic of overweight babies in the USA and in other countries. One infant formula (also available in the Philippines) he cited had a 10.3% sucrose content versus the 10.5% sucrose content in a leading soft drink brand.

He also said there is no difference between HFCS and sucrose or table sugar.

“They’re both really bad. They’re both dangerous. They’re both poison.”

Differences of opinion
Although Dr. Lustig’s attacks on sugar are severe, the medical community in the USA has not unanimously drawn the same conclusions, however. The jury’s still out on whether sugar really is a poison or not.

The American Medical Association in 2009 voiced the conventional wisdom by saying that high fructose corn syrup does not appear to contribute more to obesity than other caloric sweeteners.

Other skeptics say more Americans are overweight because they’re eating more. The average American’s daily caloric intake has jumped 24% since 1970. Still others say sugary beverages (not specifically HFCS) are the culprit, and whatever form the sugar is in does not matter.

Some researchers contend that saturated fat and not sugar is the basic cause of obesity and chronic disease. Still others argue that it is a lack of physical exercise.

Defenders of sucrose and HFCS say that to date, research suggests that HFCS and table sugar aren’t that different. They’re both processed sweeteners our bodies seem to treat them the same way.

Dr. Lemuel M. Tocjayao, a diabetologist and Chairman, Department of Internal Medicine at De Los Santos-STI Medical Center, believes that an excessive intake of table sugar can be toxic and can indirectly cause diabetes.

“As far as I know, there have been no extensive studies to prove sugar is toxic, especially when sugar is taken in moderation,” he said. “Sugar is only one factor in diabetes.”

He noted that the American Diabetes Association does not regulate sugar, nor has sugar been banned for diabetics.

He cautioned, however, that sugar should be taken in small amounts or just enough to sweeten your food and drink. That small amount, he said, is one teaspoon for a cup of coffee.

(Published in Enrich magazine, 2012)

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Order, diplomacy and Philippine coffee


THE FACE OF PHILIPPINE DIPLOMACY is a woman who can speak her mind in seven languages. That directness is probably the German in her. Or is it the Filipino in her?

"My husband always tells me I preach like a schoolteacher," says Delia Domingo-Albert, our ambassador to Germany and one of the country's most accomplished diplomats.
Ambassador Delia Domingo Albert

Among her singular achievements: chairmanship of the United Nations Security Council during the Philippines' presidency of this body in June 2004 and Secretary of Foreign Affairs, the first woman to hold this high rank in the Philippines and in the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) region.

She talks about German directness and Filipino casualness in a lively tour d' horizon that focused on effective diplomacy, organic Philippine coffee as a trade tool and the changes wrought in her character by exposure to things foreign.

Her husband, by the way, is a German who loves the Philippines. They have a home in Wiesbaden where their daughter was born. She was second-in-command of the Philippine embassy (then in Bonn) for eight years.

Consequently, Ambassador Albert has a powerful interest in German culture, dotes on Maultaschen (pasta squares filled with meat and spinach) and Rote Gruetze (a pudding made from different fresh red berries, eaten with vanilla sauce) and, not unsurprisingly, is now quite German in her dedication to efficiency.

That virtue is a resounding advantage when it comes to running an embassy in a country where relentless efficiency is the norm.

"Ordnung muss sein! (There must be order)," she says in flawless German. "I run a very well organized embassy. I expect the staff to know what they are doing... I expect them to speak German and expect them to work hard.

"I am known to be very demanding, but if you look at my curriculum vitae, I have run through all the departments. That is very rare in an ambassador. I know exactly what I can expect from everyone because I have done the job myself, so I think I am reasonable (with my demands). I like efficiency. My work ethic has produced good results.

"Puenktlichkeit (punctuality) is another of my standards. My husband has taught me that it is very inconsiderate of another person to be late and I always try to be on time."

Severe as these remarks may sound to the average Pinoy, these embody qualities demanded of any professional diplomat.

Her new posting to Germany will give her ample opportunities to practice the ambassador's art in a country no longer a stranger to her.

"I feel it is important to have a focus in order to be an effective ambassador. That is the way I like to work. It is a waste of possibilities if you use your position to simply represent," she points out.

"During my appointment as second in command in the 1980s, it was relatively easy to connect Germany to Asia due to the fact that Eastern Europe was still closed. I remember Foreign Minister Hans Dieter Genscher being very pro-Asia. It will be a challenge now to enhance that connection to Asia again.

"The competition (for investments) is fiercer as Eastern Europe has been able to cater to many of Germany's needs since its opening up to the West. My focus will be on bringing the Philippines back into the picture in terms of investment opportunity and as a reliable trading partner."

Her efforts towards this end is not confined to her work in the embassy in Berlin. Diplomacy, after all, is a two-way exchange.

"I've also suggested to German Ambassador (to the Philippines) Axel Weishaupt to gather Philippine and German individuals and look at what has transpired during our 50 years of diplomatic, business and cultural relations to help identify the strong points within this relationship, and to use these findings to formulate objectives for the next 50 years to create a roadmap based on the experiences of the past," she explains.

"The Philippines and Germany have a very good relationship and I am grateful for that. Yet this needs to be translated into economic cooperation," she continues.

She points out that Philippine companies should concentrate on finding niches that can translate into mutually beneficial economic activities. She is particularly keen on seeing partnerships in environmentally acceptable or "green" processes made possible by German technology.

She admits the "lively" political situation in the Philippines poses a challenge to marketing the country in Germany. She points out, however, that all countries go through periods of change.

"I remind them that we, as a country, have already been through a lot and are still standing. The fundamental laws of democracy do exist here and are not altered.

With the embassy as the frontline in the push to sell the Philippines, Ambassador Albert aims to showcase the best of the country in all aspects. For one thing, she will introduce organically grown Philippine coffee to Germany.

"We will be serving only Philippine coffee in the embassy to make it a tradition with our guests," she notes. "I plan to have an open house one day a week where anybody can come in to the embassy. I have always done that. I want to serve Philippine coffee, maybe with moscovado and bibingka."

She recounts her experience heading our embassy in Australia. "I remember in Canberra we used to open the embassy to groups of Australian school kids and we would serve them macaroons. And I would tell them, "You must always eat macaroons because they are made from coconuts that we sell to your country."

She intends to have other items on her plate. "Another thing is Philippine tablea chocolate. My mother used to make that and I just love it! In the same way that I was able to penetrate the Australian market with Philippine mangoes, I would like to promote organically grown Philippine coffee in Germany."

Ambassador Albert comes to her new job toting one of the most formidable resumes in the Philippine diplomatic service. She speaks Filipino, English, German, French, Romanian, Spanish and Japanese. She has represented the Philippines in nine countries.

In 1992, she was awarded the Knights Commanders Cross of the Order of Merit with Star by the Federal Republic of Germany for promoting Philippine relations with Germany, as well as relations between ASEAN and the European Union. In January 2004, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo conferred on her the Order of Sikatuna, rank of Datu, for her exceptional service to the Philippines.

The Philippine Women's University in 2003 conferred on her the degree of Doctor of Humanities, honoris causa, in recognition of her contribution towards building a gender-fair society as the first woman Secretary of Foreign Affairs in the Philippines and in the ASEAN.

She returns to a Germany far different from the Cold War front line state she knew in the 1980s. She looks forward to seeing the former East Germany, especially Leipzig, Dresden and Magdeburg.

"I now have the chance to witness the impact of the unification, which I literally watched from the front row. I saw the beginnings, I witnessed the unbelievable downfall of the Berlin Wall and I know of the hopes that were attached to those events at the time. I am curious to see what has become of it.

"Berlin is an important player in Europe. It will be a challenging job and I am very much looking forward to rediscover this country that I have only known as a divided country," she notes.

A career diplomat, Ambassador Albert has discovered that it does help kindle your professionalism if you love your job. "I've always wanted to become a diplomat. I've always loved history and I like to travel. It was the perfect match for me," she explains.

(Published in Starweek Magazine of The Philippine Star, Sept. 11, 2005)


Thursday, February 13, 2014

Debris: The Great War 100 years hence



IT WAS FIRST called The Great War, and it was indeed the greatest war the world had yet seen until that time.

It involved the British, French, German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian empires, and the republican but colonialist United States of America. Through a series of alliances, these Great Powers created a balance of power that held the destiny of the world in their hands at the start of the 20th Century.

It was then called The World War. This war, however, was later depicted to some of the peoples of these empires as “The War to End All Wars” in propaganda aimed at stoking both patriotism and idealism. Four years of incredibly lavish blood-letting never before seen in 5,000 years of recorded history led to the deaths of over 21 million soldiers and civilians in a totally misguided and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to bring about Peace through War.

It was also described as the world’s first “Industrial War;” the world’s first “Technology War” and the world’s first “Propaganda War.”

This war of many inhuman firsts—World War I— marks the 100th Anniversary of its outbreak this year, 2014.

European empires before World War I.

No nation, least of all those who fought in this tragic conflict, will celebrate a war that mass-produced mass murder; became a universal symbol of military incompetence and callousness, and introduced into the world the first of those man-made killing agents widely known today as “Weapons of Mass Destruction” or WMDs.

The world’s first WMD was poison gas. This new weapon of war was first unleashed in 1915 on French soldiers on the Western Front in Belgium. Poison gas killed 90,000 soldiers and crippled 1.3 million others on both sides during this war. Most of the poison gas victims were French and British fighting men.

This explains the great aversion to poison gas shown today by France, Britain and the USA—and their willingness to use military force to prevent the renewed use of poison gas. Their distaste was made manifest during the poison gas attacks by the Syrian government in August 2013.

British Tommies, victims of a German poison gas attack.

Such were the many horrible firsts introduced into a peaceful world by The First World War. This Great War or The World War or The War to End All Wars was only widely referred to as World War I after its far more terrible child, World War II, engulfed Europe then the world from 1939 to 1945.

Instead of a 100th anniversary celebration, however, the world will remember the tens of millions of victims of a war that gave birth to the chaotic world we live in today—a world in which military power is at its greatest height.

We, all of us, are debris of The First World War.

The road to world war
The date of the many commemorations of 1914 will vary according to country, but will begin in present day Bosnia. The Great War began in Bosnia on June 28, 1914. On this fateful day in the city of Sarajevo in Bosnia (then a part of the Kingdom of Serbia), a young Bosnian Serb student named Gavrilo Princip shot and killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary.

This assassination, which also saw the murder of the Archduke’s wife, ignited a diplomatic crisis when Austria-Hungary delivered to Serbia an ultimatum ordering compliance with a set of 10 harsh demands. Austria-Hungary had intentionally made the ultimatum unacceptable; its real intent was to provoke a war with Serbia.

Frantic to avoid war with an empire, Serbia met eight of the 10 demands. Austria-Hungary, nevertheless, declared war on Serbia on July 28 and bombarded Serbia this same day as a prelude to an invasion. These were the first shots of what would become The First World War only six day later.

This war, however, would have remained just another local war. It would have been confined to the Balkans, “the powder keg of Europe” and the most probable flash point for any European war. It would have, were it not for the two mutually distrustful alliances whose massive armies were poised for war at a moment’s notice.

The major protagonists: the British Tommy, French poilu, German landser and  Russian muzhik.

These two alliances split Europe: the Triple Entente consisted of the French empire, the British Empire and the Russian Empire while the Triple Alliance or the Central Powers comprised the German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire.

The Russian Empire, which considered itself ruler of the Slav peoples including the Serbs, partially mobilized its massive armed forces on July 29 to deter Austria-Hungary from, further aggression. The German Empire mobilized against Russia on July 30 in fulfillment of its military obligations to Austria-Hungary.

Refusing to immediately mobilize in the west to counter the German mobilization, the French were finally forced to do so on August 2 when Germany invaded neutral Belgium and attacked French troops. Germany’s immediate strategic aim, which was detailed in the Schlieffen Plan, was to speedily defeat France before turning east to destroy Russia. Germany failed and the stage was set for four years of the most terrible warfare yet witnessed.

Germany declared war on Russia on August 1 and on France on August 2. The British Empire—the world’s largest—declared war on Germany on August 4. The British declaration of war immediately transformed a local conflict in the Balkans into an international conflagration thereafter called The First World War. Europe had blundered into war.

It is a war defined by horrible images seared into mankind’s shared consciousness: brave young men suicidally charging machine guns; the endless lines of trenches on the Western Front resembling open graves; the brutal winters in Russia freezing men to death by the thousands and the unimaginably horrific artillery barrages lasting up to a week on the Western Front that either blasted soldiers to bits or buried them alive in their trenches.

Landsern on the Western Front take a respite from battle.

Remembrance
A hundred years on and the hatreds that once divided Europe are today dimly remembered. In place of imperial alliances has appeared the New Europe in the form of the 28-nation European Union or the EU. There has been no Great War in Europe since 1945, an unbroken span of 68 years, and the longest period in modern European history without a war involving Europe’s major powers. The EU is achieving its aim of banishing war as an instrument of national policy.

It is in the spirit of this peaceful New Europe that commemorations of The First World War will together involve the countries that took part in this war. In April 2013, France and Germany—the bitterest of foes in the 19th and 20th centuries—agreed to finance events that will commemorate rather than celebrate the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of World War I. Both countries will do so until June 2014 in Sarajevo, capital of the present-day state of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Bosnia-Herzegovina announced the creation of an endowment for First World War centenary remembrance plans called "Sarajevo-Heart of Europe.” The central commemoration of the 100th anniversary will be a concert to be played by the Vienna Philharmonic on June 28 in Sarajevo.

It is ironic and a welcome sign of the demise of past national animosities that Austrians, whose ancestors ignited the First World War, will hold a concert in Sarajevo, the place where the war began, for Bosnians whom they attacked at the start of the war. A series of concerts will also be held throughout Bosnia-Herzegovina before that ceremony.

Poilus assault the German trenches. The man in the foreground has just been shot.

A quiet commemoration
Besides this joint commemoration in Sarajevo, however, it seems Germany would rather not remember the past but instead wants to focus on the future of the EU that it helped create in 1993.

“For us, it is about remembrance and reconciliation, and trying to learn lessons,” an officer from Germany’s embassy in the UK was quoted as saying. He said German commemorations of the First World War will focus on how the EU has brought European nations closer together.

The French also seem to want a quiet remembrance of the First World War. What they’ve so far announced is that France will carry out a policy of national remembrance. But in many of France’s cities, towns and villages where “La Premiere Guerre Mondiale” or “La Grande Guerre” or "La Guerre du Droit" (The War for Justice) are routinely commemorated every year, this policy of national remembrance in 2014 will certainly add to the patriotic fervor.

Celebrating victory
The United Kingdom, on the other hand, will salute its heroes very loudly. It will hold a series of national remembrance events for its First World War Centenary. These events will consist of an extensive cultural program and educational scheme to commemorate what it likes to refer to as The Great War.

The last two British soldiers who served in the Great War died in July 2009 within one week of each other. The last British soldier from The Great War was Harry Patch. Before he died at 111 years-old, Patch spent his last years urging his friends and admirers never to forget the millions of men on both sides who gave their lives during The Great War.

Battlefield in northern France.

"War isn't worth one life," said Patch, who was wounded and traumatized for life by the inhuman horror and carnage he experienced at the Battle of Passchendaele fought from June to November 1917. Passchendaele, the bloodiest British battle in The Great War, ended in a British defeat.

The British suffered over 500,000 casualties in a battle where men drowned in mud caused by unrelenting rains or were cut down in droves by German machine guns. The battle has become synonymous with the stupidity and heartlessness of the British generals who went through with the battle despite warnings to the contrary. The British soldiers were truly “Lions led by donkeys.” For the Germans, however, their victory despite being heavily outnumbered helped prevent the ultimate collapse of their Western Front.

Condemning the flawed British plans that led to the tremendous slaughter of British infantry, David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister from 1916 to 1922, said this of the Battle of Passchendaele in 1938: “Passchendaele was indeed one of the greatest disasters of the war . . . No soldier of any intelligence now defends this senseless campaign . . . ."

Tommies attack amid poison gas.

Russia remembers
But there will not be a grand commemoration of The Great War in Russia despite Russia’s key role in the defeat of the Central Powers. For over three years, the pathetically armed and badly led Russian armies unselfishly sacrificed themselves for their Western Allies. Their offensives saved France and Britain from early defeat by Germany and kept over half the mighty German Army on the eastern front.

The efficient Germans inflicted colossal defeats on the ill-trained Russians, eventually forcing Russia to surrender in March 1918 and quit the war. But it was a costly victory for Germany; over half of all German casualties in The Great War were inflicted by the Russians.

It is this bitter defeat in 1918 that has made the “Second Patriotic War,” as the Russian’s call The Great War, a source of shame and forgetting. As a general rule, the Russians never commemorate the war. Two million Russian soldiers died for their country but to this day, no national monuments worthy of the memory of her heroes or the other victims of the Second Patriotic War have been built in Russia. The Second Patriotic War is truly Russia’s “Forgotten War.”

But Russia now belatedly remembers her dishonored heroes. The Organizing Committee for the 100th Anniversary of World War I is now in the process of erecting a monument honoring Russia’s forgotten heroes on Poklonnaya Hill in Moscow. Russia also plans to take part in international events dedicated to commemorating the 100th anniversary of The Great War.

Muzhiks on the march.

The world forgets
It will be extremely difficult to awaken the world to an event, however shattering, that occurred in a dimly lit past. One barrier to any widespread remembrance of World War I is World War II. This far deadlier and more recent war is favorite fare on TV, the movies, YouTube and the Internet.

The powerful images of goose-stepping Nazis, massive Tiger tanks and Adolf Hitler haranguing adoring multitudes imprint the Second World War more easily on younger minds than does the First World War, which seems to be a “Grandfather’s War” fought in grainy black and white videos.

Remember, however, that the Second World War is also seen as a continuation of the First World War. German grievances over the harsh terms imposed by the victors that impoverished Germany, and the murderous effects of the worldwide economic depression of 1929 on the German people, gave rise to right wing groups promising to restore German pride and prosperity.

Among these fringe right wing cabals advocating Germany’s return to power was the “Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.” This motley crew of misfits in 1919 welcomed into its ranks as its 55th member an obscure but decorated World War I veteran named Adolf Hitler. It took 14 years for Hitler and his Nazis to seize control of the Germany and six more years to plunge the world into a far more ghastly world war.

But both the First and the Second World Wars took place in the 20th century, the most violent century in human history. Happily, that century is over. And it is a remote possibility that a Third World War will consume the world in the first half of the 21st Century.

Wars are now “local” but must be condemned for their wanton destruction of human life. Peace is always preferable to war. That is the eternal lesson of The First World War the world chooses to forget.

(Published in the January 2014 issue of  Enrich, magazine of Mercury Drug Corporation)

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Epifanio de los Santos: Filipino polymath


(Published in the Philippine Daily Inquirer, Dec. 4, 2011)

IF IT WEREN'T FOR the dogged determination by a group of intellectuals in 1958, the historic Metro Manila landmark we call Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (or EDSA) might well have been named “Avenida 19 de Junio” instead. Or “Pres. Ramon Magsaysay Avenue.” How does “Gen. Douglas MacArthur Highway” sound?

And if EDSA wasn’t named EDSA, what would we have called the People Power Revolution of 1986?

Epifanio de los Santos Avenue honors a man who, despite his relative obscurity today, was described by noted historian Gregorio Zaide as a rare genius because of his encyclopedic knowledge and talents, and by others as the greatest Filipino intellectual after Dr. Jose Rizal.

Epifanio de los Santos

The words “Polymath” or “Universal Genius” come to mind when one considers de los Santos’ achievements as a lawyer, historian, journalist, scholar, jurist, philosopher, bibliophile, biographer, philologist, painter, poet, musician, literary critic, politician, librarian, biographer of Spanish literature, translator (Spanish, English, French and German), linguist (Ita, Tingian, Ibaloi), researcher and philanthropist.

He was hailed as the “First Filipino Academician” and few scholars could match his extensive knowledge about the Philippines. At his death in 1928, he was honored as “Great among the Great Filipino Scholars,” a magnificent tribute to one of the greatest intellectuals this country has produced.

Fervent Patriot and Writer
Born to a rich family in Malabon on April 7, 1871, de los Santos or “Don Panyong” studied at the Ateneo Municipal de Manila where he graduated Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude, in March 1890. In 1891, he took jurisprudence at the Santo Tomas Law School and obtained his Licentiate in Law 1898.

School uniforms and a classroom at the Ateneo Municipál de Manila

De los Santos was considered one of the best Filipino writers in Spanish in his time. He was the first Filipino to become a member of the Spanish Royal Academy of Language (a position denied Rizal), the Spanish Royal Academy of Literature and the Spanish Royal Academy of History in Madrid.

Despite his love for the Spanish language, de los Santos was a fiery patriot who championed Philippine independence through journalism. He became associate editor of the influential revolutionary paper "La Independencia" in 1898 using the pen name, G. Solon. He co-founded the patriotic newspapers “La Libertad,” “El Renacimiento,” “La Democracia” and “La Patria.” Among his famous patriotic essays were “Filipinos y filipinistas” and “Filipinas para los Filipinos”.

De los Santos also wrote extensively in Tagalog and was an eminent scholar of a group called the "Samahan ng mga Mananagalog" founded by Felipe Calderon in 1904. His peers in this circle of great Tagalog writers were Lope K. Santos, Rosa Sevilla, Hermenigildo Cruz, Jaime de Veyra and Patricio Mariano.

A passionate bibliophile, de los Santos’ Filipiniana collection was rated as the best in the world by foreign scholars, according to Zaide. This because de los Santos searched Europe, Asia and the Americas for rare Philippine documents in museums, archives and libraries. He also amassed a personal library comparable to Rizal’s.

Don Panyong’s art collection consisted of some 200 paintings and sculptures by famous Filipinos masters such as Juan Luna, Felix Resurreccion Hidalgo, Fabian de la Rosa, Arellano, Pablo and Fernando Amorsolo and Guillermo Tolentino. In Europe, he was recognized as the premier philologist and biographical writer about the Philippines.

A rich Filipino mestizo family in the early 1900s.

First Civil Governor of Nueva Ecija
As a politician, he was a member of the Malolos Congress, served as fiscal of Nueva Ecija (his father’s province) and was the first provincial Governor of Nueva Ecija in 1902 under the American civil government. His election made him the first democratically elected Governor and head of the Federal Party in Nueva Ecija.

He was re-elected Governor 1904. After his term as Governor, de los Santos was appointed provincial fiscal of Bulacan and Bataan. In 1907, he wrote an essay with the interesting title, “Fraudes electorales y sus remedios,” (Electoral fraud and its remedies) for the Philippine Assembly.

In 1918, he was appointed Technical Director of the Philippine Census. His last and most significant government position was Director of the Philippine Library and Museum, to which was appointed by Gov. Gen. Leonard Wood in 1925. By tradition, this post was reserved for Filipinos of learning and scholarship.

As head of the museum, de los Santos abandoned his personal collecting to build the museum’s collection of paintings, sculpture and all other art forms to an extent that his contributions exceeded that of his predecessors. He was still Director when he died from a stroke at the age of 57 in 1928.

A Triumph for Intellectuals
The North and South Circumferential Road, which Commonwealth President Manuel Quezon envisioned as the country’s most beautiful highway, began construction in the late 1930s. For reasons that remain unclear, the Americans renamed this road Highway 54 after the end of World War II.

In 1959, by virtue of Republic Act 2140, Highway 54 was renamed Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA), in recognition of Don Panyong’s genius and contributions to the country’s intellectual and artistic heritage. Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, however, was not the favorite choice for Highway 54’s new name.

It competed against three formidable alternatives: “Avenida 19 de Junio” (in honor of Rizal’s birthday); President Ramon Magsaysay Avenue (in memory of Pres. Magsaysay who died in 1957) and Gen. Douglas MacArthur Highway (for the man who led U.S. forces in liberating the Philippines from Japanese tyranny in World War II). Compared to these great men, Epifanio de los Santos was the dark horse in the race.

De los Santos’ assistant at the Philippine Library and Museum, Eulogio Rodriguez (who would later become Senate President), however, vigorously spearheaded the move to rename Highway 54 Epifanio de los Santos Avenue. After Rodriguez’s death, Juan Francisco Sumulong (de los Santos’ classmate at the Santo Tomas Law School), continued the campaign.

EDSA champions: Eulogio Rodriguez, Sr. and Juan Francisco Sumulong

His lobbying and that of the Philippine Historical Committee, the Philippine Historical Association, the Philippine Library Association, the Association of University and College Professors, the Philippine National Historical Society and the Philippine China Cultural Association won the day for Epifanio de los Santos Avenue. It was a triumph for the Filipino intellectual.

The text of Republic Act 2140 approved on April 7, 1959 reads:” The name of Highway 54 in the Province of Rizal is changed to Epifanio de los Santos Avenue in honor of Don Epifanio de los Santos, a son of said province and the foremost Filipino scholar, jurist and historian of his time.”

Historic EDSA
EDSA today is the country’s most historic highway, its name being indelibly linked to the People Power Revolution or EDSA I that restored democracy in 1986 and EDSA II or the EDSA Revolution of 2001 against Pres. Joseph Estrada. It is sometimes referred to as “Freedom Highway” because of these momentous events.

EDSA is the main circumferential highway in Metro Manila and runs some 24 kilometers (or 15 miles) from Caloocan City in the north to Pasay City in the south. EDSA is a 10-lane expressway that also encompasses the Metro Rail Transit (MRT) Line 3 extending from Taft Avenue in the south to Monumento in the north by 2011.

It forms the major portion of the Circumferential Road 4 (C-4) in Metro Manila and runs in a semicircle through the cities of Pasay, Makati, Mandaluyong, Quezon City and Caloocan.

In August 2009, Senator Mar Roxas filed a bill seeking to rename Epifanio de los Santos Avenue “Cory Aquino Avenue.” According to Roxas, “It is but fitting to offer in her memory the road that had made her famous all over the world.” Mrs. Aquino, Philippine President from 1986 to 1992, died on August 1, 2009.

Whether Pres. Noynoy Aquino will forcefully push the bill renaming EDSA after his mother remains unclear at this time. But it will do well for the President to consider who Epifanio de los Santos was, and why naming Metro Manila’s longest highway after him honors the Filipino as an intellectual.

The EDSA People Power Revolution of Feb. 1986 that toppled Ferdinand Marcos


Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Green and healthy buildings are on the rise


(Published in Enrich, magazine of Mercury Drug Corporation)

IT'S KIND OF KIND hard wrapping your head around data showing that buildings, yes, buildings are a major man-made source of unhealthy carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution, and also use up most of the world’s electricity every year.

Buildings emit about 40% of the total amount of CO2 in the U.S., according to government data. While comparable data is absent, it can perhaps be reasonably assumed the percentages are almost similar for the Philippines. Residential, commercial and industrial building operations also consume 75% of total electricity generated in the United States. Evidently, the building sector (industrial, commercial, residential and others) should be a primary target in any national effort to combat climate change and enhance human health.

“The world is putting 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. The building industry is responsible for half of the total carbon emissions,” said architect Amado de Jesus, a founder of the “Philippine Green Building Initiative (PGBI)” launched this March. “One way to promote sustainability in the building sector is to raise awareness among building owners, developers, architects, engineers, contractors and occupants.”

Makati City
PGBI’s main activities include the adoption of a Green building rating system and standards adapted to the Philippines’ humid climate. PGBI will also promote sustainable building practices in aid of legislation and formulate public policy relating to climate change. New buildings are its main target group; retrofitting of existing buildings is also a goal.

PGBI pushes “Green Architecture,” which is a sustainable method of Green building design. Green Architecture is design and construction with the environment in mind. Green architects generally work with the key concepts of creating energy efficient and environment friendly buildings.

Energy Efficient Buildings
Energy efficiency over the entire life cycle of a building is the most important single goal of Sustainable or Green Architecture. In the Philippines, however, the fight for Green Architecture has only just begun. “To reduce carbon emissions we have to design and build Green buildings that use energy efficiently,” de Jesus explained. The Philippines is 48th among 212 countries in man-made CO2 emissions.

He noted that Green Architecture has two objectives: cut building operating costs (including energy consumption and maintenance) to minimize a building’s negative impact on the environment, and promote a healthy lifestyle to ensure the health and well-being of building occupants.

The Green Architecture movement in the Philippines involves construction design that is environmentally sensitive; in harmony with natural features in a project site; is energy efficient in that it emphasizes passive systems and uses materials that are recyclable and derived from sustainable sources that can be replenished or replaced so there is lesser wastage. It is basically the intelligent use of materials for the right purpose.

“It is the role of the Green architect to be able to meet these two objectives with as little compromise between protecting the earth and meeting human needs. The whole point of green architecture rests on accomplishing these two general objectives. Green architecture is proof that both man and his natural environment can live in perfect harmony,” de Jesus said.

“Green Architecture is very promising. It is the future,” said architect Anna Siao Ling, president of the 23,500-member UAP, the driving force behind the Green Architecture movement in the Philippines. “Currently, the prime considerations of Green Architecture are minimal energy use, as well as utilizing eco-friendly products—ideas which are already visible (in) Filipino designs in the past.”

She noted that sustainability is a trait which is very Filipino. “Just by observing how local homes are insulated with nipa and make use of bamboo blinds and rolling windows, we can attest that Green concepts are not foreign to us,” she said.

Green Rating Systems
The Philippines does not have its own building rating system and prefers to use the U.S. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System). It was only in 2009 the Philippines had its first Green building certified to LEED. This is an assembly and test building of Texas Instruments in Baguio City that received a Silver certification for maximizing the use of natural daylight; extensive water recycling and a reflective roof that significantly cut heat gain.

LEED is a Green rating tool and consists of a suite of standards for environmentally sustainable construction. Established by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED is a means to rate the environment-friendly designs and energy efficiency of buildings that want to reduce negative impact on the environment. Since it began in 1998, LEED has reviewed over 14,000 projects in the U.S. and 30 countries.

The United Kingdom rates buildings according to the BREEAM environmental assessment method. In Asia, some of the existing rating systems are Japan’s CASBEE, Australia’s Green Star, Taiwan’s Green Building Label, Singapore’s Green Mark and Indonesia’s Green Building Council.

Europe is the world leader in Green Architecture and environmental awareness. But it is wise to remember that Green or sustainable architecture is a fairly recent phenomenon, even in Europe. In Germany, for example, it was only in January 2009 that the first German certificates for sustainable buildings were handed out.

In France, the government has put forward recommendations—the "Le Grenelle de l'Environnement,”—that provides a rating system to accelerate the pace of transforming new and existing buildings into sustainable structures. The first zero carbon office building in France opened in December 2009.

Other members of the European Union (EU) have their own national standards as regards Green Architecture. All of these, however, are guided by the greater goal of helping Europe reach its 2020 targets of 20% energy saved, 20% energy from renewable energy and 20% greenhouse gas reduction.

Mandatory European standards also address new or existing buildings, while the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive aims to promote improvements in the building sector.

How You Can Help
By altering his individual behavior, the average Filipino has a key role to play in pushing efforts promoting sustainable energy and infrastructure. “Earth Hour” and the Philippines’ shift to compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) are cases that prove the individual Pinoy is important in pushing a sustainable lifestyle.

Some 15 million Filipinos took part in “Earth Hour 2010” last March 27 to support the growing nationwide commitment to the environment. Organizers said the fourth staging of Earth Hour involved 4,000 cities in a record 125 countries turning off their lights for one hour thereby saving a huge amount of electricity.

During Earth Hour 2009, some 10 million Filipinos in 647 cities and municipalities saved an estimated 611MWh of electricity, the equivalent of shutting down a dozen coal-fired power-plants for an hour.

The government early this year again urged Filipinos to switch to more energy efficient CFLs, thereby cutting their monthly electric bills and reducing CO2 emissions. CFL use falls under the enhancing energy efficiency and conservation component of the Philippine Energy Efficiency Program (PEEP) whose aim is attaining a sustainable 60% energy self-sufficiency level beyond 2010.

The government plans to distribute 13 million CFLs nationwide this year, thus saving 611,000 MWh annually. By adopting CFLs nationwide in 2010, the Philippines became the first Asian country to completely ban incandescent bulbs.

PGBI is an initiative among professional building organizations that signed the “PGBI Declaration of Commitment.” Signatories include the United Architects of the Philippines, Philippine Society of Ventilating Air Conditioning Refrigerating Engineers, Institute of Integrated Electrical Engineers of the Philippines, American Society of Heating Refrigerating & Air Conditioning Engineers Philippine Chapter, Philippine Institute of Interior Designers, Geological Society of the Philippines, Heritage Conservation Society and International Council of Monuments & Sites Philippines.

(Published in Enrich, healthy lifestyle magazine of Mercury Drug Corporation, 2010.)